(as another has pointed out in this thread) sorry for this rather negative opinion, but is just my opinion as is. Likewise, when I edit with "ex" (after I had to give up Teco) I don't use "ex", I just edit. You would need a system that could intermingle function calls and variables from various languages. Regardless, Lucid needed those features to move ahead with Energize, so they ended up releasing their own version of Emacs 19, known as Lucid Emacs or Lemacs for short (as opposed to what they called FSF Emacs or FSFmacs for short). An objection to Zawinski’s version of the story. Pages there haven't been updated for 5 or 10 years. XEmacs, long de-coupled with a commercial sponsor, is without a meaningful goal or leaderhip, just gradually languished. ... Quail supports both typical "dead-key" methods (eg, in the "latin-1-prefix" method, " … ; Alt+x query-replace-regexp 【Ctrl+Alt+%】 → interactive find replace with regex, on active region, or cusor point to end. XEmacs is a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system. Great post. It seems diplomatic to me at least; Zawinski describes it as “pusillanimous” (showing ignoble cowardice, or contemptible timidity). It took me and Mike McMahon endless hours to implement so many commands to make ZWEI/Zmacs.Now, if you mean reimplement the core of GNU [X]Emacs, the stuff that's written in C, so that the existing elisp can all be used, that's more realistic. XEmacs is a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system. I am really willing to try to learn it. If only they knew how nice is a big black Emacs window maximized in my stumpwm…, Forgive me for this, but I have to do it:VIM FTW!! And there the story ends. I tweeted a coupla wh00ts about UltraEdit and a buddy pointed me to this post.Ok, so I don't use XEmacs.But I gotta say: finding an article like this refreshes my belief that there's sentient life on Spaceship Earth.wh00t wh000t! Nowadays, XEmacs is essentially dead. Long Live XEmacs!”, 2008. 2017年7月27日 閲覧。 “Luckily many of the package maintainers are attempting to make their modules work with both Xemacs and Gnu Emacs, though the functionality may not be identical.” Its emphasis is on modern graphical user interface support and an open software development model, similar to Linux. You generally can't crash Emacs with bad Elisp.I like Greasemonkey, but (last I tried it), it makes browsing slower...it seems to be linear with the number of GM scripts you bolt on.For that matter, the original Netscape let you edit HTML pages...can't you do that in Mozilla as well? Learning More About Xemacs. I suspect a lot of open-source projects face a similar challenge, which is why you get so many linux distros, KDE and Gnome, and about 5.6x10^7 MVC frameworks. We’ll cover Emacs’s handling ofproportional fonts later. Stack Exchange Network. He keeps a low profile on the net, so he doesn't get the recognition he deserves. Reading through the email archive mentioned above, I noticed a few references to a supposed “Emacs steering committee”. I can't really see its design in a text-based web browser.I really want drag & drop between multiple applications. That warmonger VIM is sitting back and laughing at us. Something like, killing all the open buffers would close the application, instead of leaving a *scratch* buffer. The selected window contains the cursor on the character after point. You will be assimilated. Dude, i've been using xemacs nearly every day since 1997 and i think it's crashed on me 1 time, maybe 2. Maybe stevey's not using the normal word "blog" (hereafter "blog¹") at all. Thank you.Other occurrences on the page that indicate you know this already:A dude with arguably the best cat-picture blog ever created.Keep up the cat blog.Stevey's Personal Blog, Well, I had written a longish rant about Firefox as a platform or building an extensible editor being a crazy-but-possibly-brilliant idea with a huge amount of scope. While it currently only aspires to be a web browser, it's picking up an awful lot of the emacs nature, and I suspect that if someone wanted to, it could easily turn into a real emacs, but with a superior rendering engine and Javascript as the extension language. But it seems to me that a lot of what desktop.el saves is stuff that you tend to set through your .emacs anyway.saveconf.elThanks for all the Emacs articles, by the way. If that's why you think Emacs is becoming more popular than xemacs, you've got some more karma to work out. I go back and re-read them every year or so. Not all of them, but enough of them to make an impact. I can understand that a Lisp user love it. The environment was to be based on Emacs, and the commercial product came to be known as Energize. Start coding that emacs extension for Firefox now, instead of losing time trying to resist. Did somebody plant rumors about a “steering committee” in order to drive a wedge between Lucid and FSF? To be clear, nothing here is firsthand information. In EmacsAsOperatingSystem and UnixCulture there is the comment that "Emacs is a refugee from the long dead culture of LispMachines. I think that's what makes Emacs really cool. I confess, I am a TextMate/Mac user. GNU Emacs has support for many alphabets, scripts, writing systems, and cultural conventions and provides spell-checking for many languages by calling external programs such as ispell. Emacs starts up a lot faster than any similarly-sized Java app; yet they are both bytecode systems.It's also time to start mainstreaming voice input to complement the keyboard and mouse.Bytecode systems are increasingly obsolete.
2020 is xemacs dead